Plenary Session 4
Integrating Critical Race Theory into the Curriculum of Canada’s Law Schools
November 13, 1 - 2 p.m. EST
“Critical Race Theory'' has been much-discussed but little-understood over the past year in the wake of global uprisings for racial justice. Various state authorities across the United States have sought to limit discussion of race and racial inequality, while a group of benchers at the Law Society of Ontario are organizing for the next Law Society election on a campaign to “STOP WOKE” and “REMOVE social engineering, identity politics and critical race theory from the Law Society''. In contrast, various calls have been made for more critical study of race in law: many law schools across Canada have specifically sought out new hires whose work explores racial justice and groups of scholars in the United States have been organizing to develop new law school curriculums that better engage with the exigencies of the present moment. Why does critical analysis of racial inequality inspire so much opposition amongst certain groups? Is the current cycle of censorship against speech linked to racial justice unique or part of a broader historical pattern? And what does it mean to integrate critical race theory into the Canadian legal curriculum specifically, and in Canadian legal education more broadly?
Moderator:
Joshua Sealy-Harrington, Assistant Professor, Lincoln Alexander School of Law
Panelists:
Scott Franks, Assistant Professor, Lincoln Alexander School of Law
Dr. Angela Lee, Assistant Professor, Lincoln Alexander School of Law
Patricia J. Williams, James L. Dohr Professor of Law Emerita, Columbia Law School
Donna E. Young, Inaugural Dean, Lincoln Alexander School of Law